<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>spragg-ssl.co.uk/html/img/icons, branch master</title>
<subtitle>The spragg-ssl.co.uk website</subtitle>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://spragg-ssl.co.uk/projects/cgit.cgi/spragg-ssl.co.uk/'/>
<entry>
<title>Change alias for /icons to symlink for /img/icons</title>
<updated>2018-06-06T11:26:05+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Adam Spragg</name>
<email>adam@spra.gg</email>
</author>
<published>2018-06-06T11:26:05+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://spragg-ssl.co.uk/projects/cgit.cgi/spragg-ssl.co.uk/commit/?id=07e873c5febe306fa9159eb7818506bf3dad1bdd'/>
<id>07e873c5febe306fa9159eb7818506bf3dad1bdd</id>
<content type='text'>
So we don't conflict with the alias for /icons/ already set up by
mod_alias, and in use by mod_autoindex.

Seriously, who thought it would be a good idea to reserve the /icons
namespace, as if no website might already want to use that???
</content>
<content type='xhtml'>
<div xmlns='http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml'>
<pre>
So we don't conflict with the alias for /icons/ already set up by
mod_alias, and in use by mod_autoindex.

Seriously, who thought it would be a good idea to reserve the /icons
namespace, as if no website might already want to use that???
</pre>
</div>
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
